
Dota 2: Vici Gaming vs Team Resilience (BO3) - DreamLeague China Closed Qualifier Playoffs
Total Volume
$3K
24h Volume
$3K
Markets
20
Liquidity
$20K

Match Winner
$2K today
75%

O/U 2.5 Games
$1K today
40%

Game 1 Winner
$28 today
69%

Game 2 Winner
$28 today
69%

Both Teams Beat Roshan
$0 today
23%

Any Player Ultra Kill
$0 today
15%

Game Handicap: VG (-1.5) vs Team Resilience (+1.5)
$0 today
47%

Ends in Daytime
$0 today
48%

Both Teams Beat Roshan
$0 today
23%

Both Teams Destroy Barracks
$0 today
12%

Any Player Rampage
$0 today
10%

Ends in Daytime
$0 today
48%

Ends in Daytime
$0 today
52%

Both Teams Destroy Barracks
$0 today
12%

Any Player Ultra Kill
$0 today
15%

Any Player Rampage
$0 today
20%

Both Teams Beat Roshan
$0 today
33%

Both Teams Destroy Barracks
$0 today
51%

Any Player Ultra Kill
$0 today
52%

Any Player Rampage
$0 today
51%
Ready to trade?
Put real money on your predictions.
About this event
This market refers to the Dota 2 Upper bracket final match between Vici Gaming and Team Resilience in the DreamLeague China Closed Qualifier Playoffs, initially scheduled for April 13 at 8:00AM ET.
This market will resolve to "Vici Gaming" if Vici Gaming win the match against Team Resilience.
This market will resolve to "Team Resilience" if Team Resilience win the match against Vici Gaming.
If the match is canceled (not played at all), ends in a tie, or is delayed beyond 7 days from the scheduled date without a winner determined, this market will resolve to 50-50.
If the match begins but is not completed, and one team wins due to the opponent's forfeiture, disqualification, or walkover, this market will resolve to the team who wins.
If the match ends in a forfeit, disqualification, or walkover (team withdraws before the start and the other wins automatically), this market will resolve to 50-50.
The resolution source for this market will be official information from https://www.dotabuff.com. However, if https://www.dotabuff.com has not published final results within 2 hours after the event’s conclusion, a consensus of credible reporting may be used instead including video evidence.
In cases where a team’s listed name includes minor discrepancies from the resolution source, this market will resolve based on the underlying real-world match rather than exact name matching. Recognizable abbreviations, alternate or erroneous spellings, sponsor tags, affiliate or academy designations, regional identifiers, and minor formatting differences will be treated as referring to the same team, provided the intended team can be clearly and uniquely identified within the relevant competition. If a listed team name has no reasonable connection to any participating team, or if it matches or could reasonably refer to another team in the same competition such that the intended team cannot be unambiguously determined, this market will resolve 50-50.